AI/ML Privacy Impact Engineering
Engineering services for GDPR compliance of AI/ML systems: training data privacy, model auditing, explainability for Article 22 compliance, and differential privacy implementation.
GDPR-compliant AI/ML engineering: training data anonymization/pseudonymization, model bias and re-identification risk audit, explainability implementation (SHAP/LIME) for Article 22 automated decision-making, and differential privacy for model training. Fixed price €3,600–7,200.
📋Why this service exists
Articles 22, 35, and 9 impose specific obligations on AI systems: automated decisions cannot have legal effects without human review, high-risk AI requires DPIA, and training on special category data requires explicit consent or substantial public interest. AI systems also create re-identification risks — models can 'memorize' training data.
What you get
- Training data privacy audit (re-identification risk)
- Differential privacy implementation for model training
- Explainability layer (SHAP/LIME) for automated decisions
- Bias audit report
- Article 22 compliance assessment
- Model card with privacy properties documented
- Technical DPIA component for AI system
How we deliver
- Day 0You request quote → reply in 4 business hours
- Day 1–2Discovery call & scope clarification
- Day 3–5Contract signed, kickoff scheduled
- Day 5–7Implementation begins
- Day NFinal deliverables + walkthrough call
- +30 daysFree post-delivery support
Tools & technologies
Prerequisites
- ML model and training pipeline access
- Training data description (categories, volume)
- Business description of automated decisions made by the model
Pricing
✓ Within scope:
- •One ML model or AI pipeline
- •Python ML stack (scikit-learn, PyTorch, TensorFlow)
- •Standard privacy techniques
⚠ Outside scope (additional quote required):
- •Novel privacy-preserving ML research
- •Multiple models
- •Legal Article 22 impact assessment (lawyers' scope)
📋Final price confirmed in proposal within 4 hours of your request.
Realistic timeline — what to expect
- T+0hSubmit request
- T+4hInitial proposal (business hours)
- T+1–3dDiscovery call
- T+2–3dFinal invoice
- T+3–5dContract signed
- T+4–6dPayment received
- T+5–7dService kickoff
- T+5–7d+NService complete
Frequently asked questions
What is differential privacy and does our model need it?
Does Article 22 apply to all our AI decisions?
Related services
DPIA Technical Component Development
Develop the technical component of a Data Protection Impact Assessment: system description, data flows, threat model, technical risk assessment, and proposed mitigations.
Automated Decision-Making Compliance (Article 22)
Engineering implementation of Article 22 safeguards for automated decisions: human review mechanisms, explainability, audit trails, and data subject right to contest.
Pseudonymization Architecture
Design and implement a pseudonymization system that separates real identities from behavioral data — enabling GDPR Article 25 data minimization and reducing breach risk.
