Automated Decision-Making Compliance (Article 22)
Engineering implementation of Article 22 safeguards for automated decisions: human review mechanisms, explainability, audit trails, and data subject right to contest.
Implement Article 22 technical safeguards: human-in-the-loop review mechanism for high-impact automated decisions, explainability output (SHAP/LIME), audit trail of each decision, and a data subject interface to contest decisions. Fixed price €2,700–4,500.
📋Why this service exists
Article 22 grants data subjects the right not to be subject to solely automated decisions that produce legal or similarly significant effects. When automated decisions are used (with consent or contract basis), organizations must: provide meaningful information about the logic, enable human review, and allow data subjects to contest decisions.
What you get
- Human review interface for high-impact automated decisions
- Explainability output per decision (SHAP/LIME integration)
- Decision audit trail (what model, what inputs, what output, what timestamp)
- Data subject decision inquiry interface
- Contest/appeal workflow
- Reviewer training guide
- Article 22 compliance documentation
How we deliver
- Day 0You request quote → reply in 4 business hours
- Day 1–2Discovery call & scope clarification
- Day 3–5Contract signed, kickoff scheduled
- Day 5–7Implementation begins
- Day NFinal deliverables + walkthrough call
- +30 daysFree post-delivery support
Tools & technologies
Prerequisites
- Automated decision system in production
- ML model access
- Human reviewer identified and available for workflow design
Pricing
✓ Within scope:
- •One automated decision system
- •Standard ML models (sklearn, XGBoost, neural networks)
- •Web application interface for human review
⚠ Outside scope (additional quote required):
- •Multiple decision systems
- •Custom explainability research
- •Legal Article 22 impact assessment
📋Final price confirmed in proposal within 4 hours of your request.
Realistic timeline — what to expect
- T+0hSubmit request
- T+4hInitial proposal (business hours)
- T+1–3dDiscovery call
- T+2–3dFinal invoice
- T+3–5dContract signed
- T+4–6dPayment received
- T+5–7dService kickoff
- T+5–7d+NService complete
Frequently asked questions
What does 'meaningful information about the logic' mean in Article 13(2)(f)?
When is human review sufficient to satisfy Article 22?
Related services
AI/ML Privacy Impact Engineering
Engineering services for GDPR compliance of AI/ML systems: training data privacy, model auditing, explainability for Article 22 compliance, and differential privacy implementation.
DPIA Technical Component Development
Develop the technical component of a Data Protection Impact Assessment: system description, data flows, threat model, technical risk assessment, and proposed mitigations.
GDPR Compliance Dashboard for DPO
Build a real-time compliance dashboard giving the DPO visibility into PII access events, DSAR status, erasure requests, backup test results, and open compliance tasks.
