Skip to content
Article 22Article 13(2)(f)Article 35

Automated Decision-Making Compliance (Article 22)

Engineering implementation of Article 22 safeguards for automated decisions: human review mechanisms, explainability, audit trails, and data subject right to contest.

€2,700–€4,500
EUR
60100
hours
3050
business days
Fixed scopeEU-nativeNDA pre-signed
💡Quick Answer

Implement Article 22 technical safeguards: human-in-the-loop review mechanism for high-impact automated decisions, explainability output (SHAP/LIME), audit trail of each decision, and a data subject interface to contest decisions. Fixed price €2,700–4,500.

📋Why this service exists

Article 22 grants data subjects the right not to be subject to solely automated decisions that produce legal or similarly significant effects. When automated decisions are used (with consent or contract basis), organizations must: provide meaningful information about the logic, enable human review, and allow data subjects to contest decisions.

Article 22Article 13(2)(f)Article 35

What you get

  • Human review interface for high-impact automated decisions
  • Explainability output per decision (SHAP/LIME integration)
  • Decision audit trail (what model, what inputs, what output, what timestamp)
  • Data subject decision inquiry interface
  • Contest/appeal workflow
  • Reviewer training guide
  • Article 22 compliance documentation

How we deliver

  1. Day 0
    You request quote → reply in 4 business hours
  2. Day 1–2
    Discovery call & scope clarification
  3. Day 3–5
    Contract signed, kickoff scheduled
  4. Day 5–7
    Implementation begins
  5. Day N
    Final deliverables + walkthrough call
  6. +30 days
    Free post-delivery support

Tools & technologies

custom audit checklistsexplainability toolkits (SHAP, LIME)audit logs

Prerequisites

  • Automated decision system in production
  • ML model access
  • Human reviewer identified and available for workflow design

Pricing

Base scope€2,700–€4,500
Estimated hours60100h
Hourly rate€45/h
Delivery time3050 business days

Within scope:

  • One automated decision system
  • Standard ML models (sklearn, XGBoost, neural networks)
  • Web application interface for human review

Outside scope (additional quote required):

  • Multiple decision systems
  • Custom explainability research
  • Legal Article 22 impact assessment

📋Final price confirmed in proposal within 4 hours of your request.

Realistic timeline — what to expect

  1. T+0hSubmit request
  2. T+4hInitial proposal (business hours)
  3. T+1–3dDiscovery call
  4. T+2–3dFinal invoice
  5. T+3–5dContract signed
  6. T+4–6dPayment received
  7. T+5–7dService kickoff
  8. T+5–7d+NService complete
This timeline reflects EU B2B best practices. We protect both parties from misunderstandings.

Frequently asked questions

What does 'meaningful information about the logic' mean in Article 13(2)(f)?
It doesn't require full model disclosure. It means: what data is used, what factors are most important, and roughly how the decision is made. SHAP values provide this in a legally defensible way — 'the top 3 factors in your credit decision were: payment history (35%), debt ratio (25%), account age (15%).'
When is human review sufficient to satisfy Article 22?
Human review must be 'meaningful' — not rubber-stamping. The reviewer must actually have the ability and information to override the automated decision. A checkbox with no additional context does not satisfy Article 22.

Related services

Request a quote

You're requesting a quote for:

Automated Decision-Making Compliance (Article 22)

Estimated: €2,700–4,500 · 30–50 business days

Initial proposal within 4 business hours, contract within 3 business days.

Where we'll send your proposal and invoice.

If you prefer to discuss by call.

🔒 Your data is encrypted in transit and at rest. Never shared with third parties.

Initial proposal within 4 business hours (EU hours, Mon–Fri 9:00–18:00 EET).

💼 Mutual NDA available on request before any sensitive discussion.